• 19
  • Nov

The UN general assembly recognized Palestine in 2012 as a non-member observer state, paving the way to a wider official recognition from European states.

British MPs have started debating a symbolic motion on whether to recognize the Palestinian state. Britain’s current policy towards the issue is that it "reserves the right to recognize a Palestinian state bilaterally at the moment of their choosing, and when it can best help bring about peace."

In his opening remarks, Labour MP Grahame Morris, who tabled the backbench Commons motion, said Palestinian statehood recognition "is not an Israeli bargaining chip, it is a Palestinian right". The Labour MP told his peers they have a "historic opportunity to take a small but symbolically important step" by voting in favour of the motion.

  • 15
  • Nov

SOVEREIGNTY.

There are three types of societies manifesting three forms of power, comprise three general social structures of expectations. My special concern is with such societies in the form of states. A state is a formal group that is sovereign over its members and occupies a well defined territory. It is the formal apparatus of authoritative roles and law norms through which that sovereignty is exercised.

There are three methods by which states are classified and these are;

1. Monolithic state
2. Unitary state
3. Federal state

The definitions are as follows;

1. MONOLITHIC STATE

These are which are formed out of single entities which are not linked to some other segments. Examples are, Angola, Ecuador, Zimbabwe, Yemen, Romanian, France, Haiti, etc.

One common feature of these states is that they are indivisible because they are unbreakable.

2. UNITARY STATE

These are States which are formed by more than one segment which could be two, three or more which come about due to negotiations which seek to unify their different countries. In a unitary state the local governments (if there are any) have been set up under statute law, and are in effect delegated to run certain services on behalf of a central government. Examples are; The United Arab Emirate, The United Kingdom, Tanzania, etc.

One fascinating prodigy about these States is that they are breaking and divisible if the conditions that brought them up are not followed.

3. FEDERAL STATE

These States are formed out of the desire of the people to amalgamate their States and these could be two, three or more. In a federal state there is a constitutional right for local governments to act in specified areas, such as legislation. Examples are, Nigeria, United States of America, etc.
Like the Unitary States, they are also subject to disintegration if the conditions which brought them into being are not observed.

OBSERVATIONS

Zambia's draft constitution has this to say under part II, sovereignty ;

"(3) The Republic is a unitary, indivisible, multiethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-cultural and multiparty democratic State.
(4) The Republic shall not be ceded, in whole or in part.
(5) The Republic may enter into a union or other form of inter-state organisation, which action shall not be construed as ceding the Republic." end of quote.

The above quotes defines why Barotseland is not part of Zambia, if Zambia was a unitary state it would have not mentioned that it is indivisible only monolithic states fits such statement as elaborated under monolithic state in this article. The draft constitution further mentions of the Republic not to be ceded in part or a whole, what a contradiction?

Zambia can not claim to be a unitary state when on the other hand claims to be indivisible, how can it be? This clearly elaborates Zambia's fascism and lack of understanding of international law and politics. How can unitary exist, when it is monolithic state in nature since the abrogation of union treaty (BA64) in 1969, the act that ceded Barotseland from Zambia? There draft constitution even failed to define the extent boundaries of the territory of Zambia! This and other conflicting clauses reflects the high level of intellectual fabric degradation in the Zambian political players and law makers. If their aim was targeted at completely wiping Barotseland's autonomy, it is too late and we are miles ahead of them.

We will not succumb to fake unitary claims, Zambia and Barotseland are different sister countries. Barotseland has moved from just being an instinct nation to a state and is constructing social systems that will bring fortune, power and territorial supremacy -a geo-economic phenomenon.

Tukongote Litunga Ni lyetu. Barotseland ki Naha.

By Saleya Kwalombota

  • 14
  • Nov

Let no one think or even imagine that the Barotseland struggle will die a natural death or that the Barotse people will be deceived by piecemeal construction of substandard infrastructure, which is being misrepresented as development by the Zambian regime and people who don ’ t know what development is. In their wishful thinking , it is designed to blindfold people from seeing and demanding the actualization of Barotseland statehood following the Zambian government ’ s unilateral abrogation of the Barotseland Agreement 1964 (BA ’ 64) and the peoples of Barotseland acceptance thereof and subsequent declaration of self - rule . The Barotse self - government can n either be suppressed by intimidation nor threats of terminologies like "treason" , for it is an ideal whose time has come.

The Zambia n government may ignore the Barotseland issue at their own peril , because it is like ignoring a virus wasting your body, thinking that it will one day change its mind and go to sleep or retire . The issue of Barotseland statehood precedes the existence of both Zambia in 1964 and Northern Rhodesia in 1911 . If anything, it has only been gaining momentum over the recent past . The remainder of Zambia (or whatever they will call themselves) should not think that the peoples of Barotseland and the international community went to sleep over the Zambian government ’ s unilateral abrogation of the BA ’ 64, which set in motion the separation of the two territories comprised in Zambia that was only delayed by Barotseland ’ s futile attempts to restore the Agreement for the past 47 years . The process to actualize Barotseland state hood continue to unfold and soon, may be sooner than we expect, it will be realized

No one ever thought that the Great Titanic could sink, but it did. Martin Luther King Jr, conquered the Great United States of America after he was assassinated. The white colonialists thought i t was impossible for blacks in South Africa to free themselves. Nelson Mandela conquered apartheid in South Africa while in Jail . When fire started in Benghazi, Libya , might President Muammar Gaddafi thought it was a click of rats and cockroaches , not realizing that one day the rats and cockroaches would reorganize themselves and turn up into formidable militia that could eat him, until he was captured and swallowed alive. Where is Gaddafi today? The results were seen and the world has its own story , which deserves no elaboration. Barotseland shall free herself from the black oppression of W est Nyasa (remainder of Zambia or remainder of Northern Rhodesia or North Eastern Rhodesia)

Our call for self - determination is a human and democratic right enshrined in the United Nations Charter and legally binding since the contract between Zambia and Barotseland was long terminated by the Zambian regime itself . Barotseland ’ s human and democratic right s have been stifled for a long time and this is now coming to an end. W e shall exercise our God given right and will power to redeem our selves. We call on the international community to recognize Barotseland's inherent right to self - determination and self - rule , which is long over - due as Barotseland sets to re - organize its governance institutions. We warn the Zambian regime to stay clear from this process as they will be made to account for their actions before international courts .

courtesy of BNFA.INFO

  • 14
  • Nov

The Gospel according to Saint Matthew Chapter 25 verses 41 to 45 record s Jesus Christ’s teaching as follows :

“ For I was hungry, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee hungry, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, In as much as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. ” ( KJV)

Does this sound as one of those Sabbath or Sunday sermons in one of our local churches? Nay, this a preamble to a response to the recent calls from three mother church bodies in the failed unitary state of Zambia comprised of the Council of Churches of Zambia (CCZ), Evangelical Fellowship of Zambia (EFZ) and the Episcopal Conference of Zambia (ZEC) for dialogue over the now defunct Barotseland Agreement 1964 (BA ’ 64) (Daily Nation, Wednesday, 29th October 2014). These are calls from hypocrites , misrepresenting the name of Jesus and the church. The bear facts are hereunder :

The BA ’ 64 unilaterally abrogated by the Kaunda regime was an international treaty that allowed Barotseland and the rest of Northern Rhodesia to proceed to independence as one country called Zambia. In 1969, the Kaunda regime annulled the unity treaty, which action led to arrests of several people of Barotseland who protested against his actions . Since then the people of Barotseland tried in vain to restore the BA ’ 64 . The least successive Zambian governments could do was to kill, mutilate and send more than 500 Barotseland nationals to prison over tramped up crimes.

We are telling representatives from the so called three mother churches bodies from the failed unitary state of Zambia once and for a ll that in as far the people s of Barotseland are concerned, they represent the oppressive state of Zambia and the matter of the BA ’ 64 was shunted to the back yard on 27th March 2012. In other words, it is a dead issue. On the 27th of March the people of Barotseland resolved as follows :

“ The people of Barotseland shall exercise their right to revert to its original status as a sovereign nation, so that the people of Barotseland shall determine their political, cultural, social and economic development. ”

T his resolution was cemented by a letter dated 12th May 2012 to the late President of the failed unitary state of Zambia Michael Sata from the Ngambela of Barotseland (Prime Minister) under the subject: RECOGNITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE REPUDIATION OF THE BAROTSELAND AGREEMENT 1964 BY THE ZAMBIAN GOVERNMENT.

On the basis of the BNC resolution s , the people of Barotseland took noble and civilized steps to put the Barotse impasse to rest. These include:

1. Affiliating to the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples organization (UNPO) ;

2. Petitioning the Banjul based Africa Commission on Human and Peoples Rights (ACHPR) ; and

3. Inviting the then President of Zambia (Sata) to sign a Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) submission agreement

Unfortunately, these initiatives were treated like child play whereby today some people under sheep skin are making noise about dialogue over the Barotseland impasse . What kind of misguided thinking and foolishness is this? What is even more frustrating is that calls for dialogues are coming from agents of the oppressive regime . Surely, how does one, expect the people of Barotseland to take serious, a person who stole a motor vehicle at a tender age – and asks for forgiveness for stealing the motor vehicle while taking possession of the stolen motor vehicle and that he be allowed to be in charge of running your affairs . Come on guys we are not jokers. You have pushed us too far

‘Do not throw stones if you live in a glass house, ’ so goes an old adage. It is clear from your persistent loud crying that you are simply acting your ‘ master’s voice. ’ Let it be known by you and your sponsors that the matter of Barotseland ’ s self - determination is real and will not die away like you and me. If you are truly peace - makers (bayahi ba kozo) that you claim to be, why don ’ t you assist the Patriotic Front (PF) and the rest of Zambia to resolve their succession wrangles — is it because you cannot see them even where it is clear to blind person? What hypocrisy?

I question the three mother bodies in regard to the now defunct BA ’ 64 as follows :

1. What did you say to Kaunda, when he , in 1969 before and beyond embarked on a destructive path to destroy the very foundation of the so called unitary state of Zambia?

2. Did you not hear the people of Barotseland seek the matter of the BA ’ 64 respected since 196 5 ?

3. Where were you when in January 2012 Zambia n government unleashed armed police , killed , injured and arrest ed Barotse nationals ?

4. Where were you when Barotse people were suffering in Zambia prisons over the past 50 years? “ in prison, and ye visited me not

5. What advice did you render to the late Sata when his government lamentably failed to submit counter evidence to the Barotse forensic evidence contained in the Petition before ACHPR for close to two years now?

6. Why did you not prevail over the late Sata and his government to take advantage of the Barotse initiated PCA process to resolve the Barotse impasse ?

7. Why did you remain mute when Sata and Kabimba (the latter then as PF Secretary General) threw unwarranted scone on Dr. Rodger Chongwe and his team of Commissioners for the report on the so called Mongu riots of 14th January 2012 o r the release of the Rodger Chongwe Commission Inquiry Report?

8. Where were you when Sata transgressed on the Ten Commandments?

9. Where were you when Zambia acquired fighter Jets and intimidated the Barotse peoples ?

10. Why were you silent when the Post Newspaper insulted the leaders of the New Apostolic Church in Barotseland for building a show piece church in Malengwa ?

The answer to all the above question s is summed up by the teaching of Lord Jesus when he addressed the Jews, in John Chapter 8 verses 39 – 44:

“ They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God. Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself , but he sent me. Why d o ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. ” (KJV)

Again, this article is far from being a Sabbath or Sunday sermon but simply an attempt to bring to the fore the behaviour of hypocrites who claim to say or do things in the name of the Christ Jesus or the Church. Th e hypocrisy in them is so deep that they lamentably fail to see ‘ wood for trees. ’

In addition, let the people at the Daily Nation know that I do not agree with them when they said in their paper’s editorial of 29th October 2014 that dialogue over the BA’64 is vital; thus categorically agreeing with calls of the three mother church bodies. I don ’ t agree because the people of Barotseland put the matter of the Agreement behind them way back in M arch 2012. As has been said already, the BA’64 is a dead issue. Moreover, Barotseland has since taken her case to the international level thereby rendering domestic engagements redundant and irrelevant. I am consoled that we all pray to the same God – the same one who referring to the children of Israel when in Egypt said: “ I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows; And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey ............” Exodus 3: 7 - 8 (KJV)

My plea to the people of Barotseland is not to waste time with these jokers. You cannot afford to fall over each other when you are fighting to free your country. YES, Bulozi ki NAHA and KINAKO. I urge all the people of Barotseland through the Barotse Government (not Barotse Royal Establishment — a term erroneously introduced by Kaunda) and the Barotse National Freedom Alliance not to relent in actualizing Barotseland statehood . I challenge the three mother church bodies, as a matter of priority , request whoever will succeed Late President Sata to sign the PCA submission agreement and vacate Barotseland within one week of his/he r inauguration. This is so because the matter of the Total Emancipation of Barotseland is IMMINENT.

KI NAKO. TUKONGOTE

Courtesy BNFA.INFO

  • 12
  • Nov

Breaking the taboos in this regard is necessary in a debate that deals increasingly with the results of political liberation, analyses the concept of solidarity, and marks the end of the cultivation of “heroic narratives”.

The struggle for political liberty for our people in Barotseland is so great that the triumph over Zambia's fascism alone is worth the sacrifice of our lives, when we successfully hosted the historic Barotse National Council of 2012 against the authoritarian, undemocratic and uncivilized Zambian law. We are determined to work for our freedom today and not tomorrow by accelerating our independence actualization action plans in place.

  • 05
  • Nov

PF got a winning streak of votes in Barotseland, thanks to the influence of Inonge Wina and Winter Kabimba who used the impasse of the Barotseland agreement in that time.

These Barotzish, who were born and bred by Barotse families, later abandoned the Barotse they used and winter even cast aside the Roger Chongwe report as rubbish and stupid!!!

Winter became so big headed, and we warned him and Inonge, plus Nathaniel Mubukwanu that one day, they will need Barotseland.
It is winter who refused to sign the petition of arbitration brought forward for attention. Winter is a snowball.

We are aware that now the three are scheming of how to use Barotse again, taking advantage that their GRZ still holds a grip on Barotseland.

NJA YA MWAHAE AINA BUTALI!!!!

These people will never get any votes in Barotseland. Though they are Barotse, we shall teach them a lesson should they try to use the youth here.
Winter, Inonge, Nathaniel…keep away.

Barotse activists must prepare a stern way to deal with Zambian politicians who will flood their blood money in Barotseland to win over weak minded souls.
Akinako yakutubeta JUDAS ye – Bulozi Nahayaluna

  • 04
  • Nov

It would be insanity for the Zambian government to bring their presidential by election campaign to Barotseland as this would contravene the territorial boundaries between the two countries. Barotseland is not the western region of Zambia; this truth should be accepted by all who believe in truth. The western province name in reference to remnant parts of Barotseland is cosmetic and it has no legal support as there was no consensus from people in the territory.

  • 02
  • Nov

There is a great pressure to try to launder the demised Zambian leader, Michael Sata’s name mainly because of the culture of most Zambian people. Like one Zambian singer, B1, bluntly put it a year ago in his song, “He was a good man.” However, truth be told Sata was just as brutal to Barotseland as his predecessors before him, if not more.

I am immediately drawn to the command Sata issued publicly to his military, and as commander in chief of his armed forces, in the presence of SADC heads of security forces when he said, “…go to Lukulu(Barotseland), and when you hear them (Lozis) say ‘eni sha’ just fire…when you hear them say ‘faa, faa’, just fire (at them)” as he expressly set a tone on how he wanted his army to deal with the people of Barotseland demanding their rights to self-determination. This was probably the lowest he had sunk to in as far as his hatred for Barotseland was concerned.

  • 30
  • Oct

 

International law did not begin with the United Nations, but the Organization has played an important role in consolidating and vastly expanding it. International law consists of a body of treaties, customary laws, judicial decisions and other relevant sources that play a central role in promoting economic and social development, as well as international peace and security among the nations of the world. It quickly becomes obvious that conflicts that have dominated the agenda of United Nations are those of political freedom in nature.

This pauses a challenge for UN to position the challenges of conflict resolutions. Barotseland issue, though, not relatively small in scale compared to many others, have consistently failed to attract attention, and has had less coverage from both international and Zambian media houses. Issues concerning Barotseland's right to freedom can be found more on the online publications than the traditional mainstream media outlets, but even then it is not as easy to find the information as the Zambian government keep on blocking internet websites viewed as publishing such information.

  • 30
  • Oct

 

The unfolding circumstance s in Zambia should be watched keenly, not that Barotseland is in any way interested in participating in the resultant elections or in who will lead Zambia following President Sata’s death but because we are dealing with people who are bent on keeping us within Zambia at all cost.

Despite having resolved to accept Zambia’s abrogation of the Barotseland Agreement 1964, Zambians have continued to act as if all was normal by imposing their administration and even conducting useless by-elections in Barotseland in the recent past.

With Zambia about to hold presidential elections within three months, a clear message must be communicated not only to the Zambian government but to all competing Zambian political parties that we do not need them to campaign in Barotseland as that is tantamount to campaigning in a foreign country.

  • 30
  • Oct

 

One of the important manifestations of effective and good leadership is consistency of word and action. Assuming that the article which appeared on the Barotse National Freedom Alliance (BNFA) website was an accurate account of what transpired during the visit to Siikalo Kuta by the Zambian Minister of Chiefs and Traditional Affairs, Hon. Nkandu Luo, then it means we can now boldly declare that Barotseland’s long-awaited freedom has finally arrived. In the meantime, we just have to work towards our Independence Day.

It was fulfilling and pleasing to note the reported words said to the Minister by Indunas Inete and Mutwaleti, as well as Mr. Go-Brown Kayuwa Kashumba, regarding the point we have now reached on the road towards the realization of Barotseland’s liberation. What the three honourable and distinguished Sons of the Soil said to the Minister brought a tear of hope, happiness, joy, satisfaction and fulfillment to my heart. As I read the article by Muyunda Makala and Mwananyandi Mukunyandela I momentarily became lost for words and, in exasperation, all I could hear my disobedient mouth blurt out were the words: “Barotseland’s freedom has finally arrived.” Going forward, all that Siikalo Kuta needs to do is to religiously reiterate the same position to whoever visits Namuso. Frankly, this was the moment we have all been waiting for; the moment when Namuso echoes and champions the aspirations and wishes of the people of Barotseland.

  • 29
  • Apr

I have a dream,a free Barotseland shall soon be realized,it is a dream rooted in the Barotse dream.

I have a dream,one day our nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed; "we will hold these truths to be self evident because human beings are created equal."

One day our captors who are sent to rule over us will be no more in Barotseland,one day we will not be promoted to junior positions,only when we insult our parents and dishonour them! And then lose the posts after a job well done. One day we will not be threatened with arrests and threatened with treasonable charges for expressing our political views.

The Barotseland Post, also known as The Barotsepost, is an online media platform, for now, that is dedicated to reporting stories and news around Barotseland and beyond, giving exclusive coverage and access to the people and the nation of Barotseland to fully express themselves in their aspirations for self- determination.