Restoring the defunct Barotseland agreement will only create a miserable trap for Barotseland

29 August 2018
Author  Sibeta Mundia, Barotseland Post
Some little children in Lealui Village, Barotseland Image Courtesy of Docugraphy

 

Restoring the defunct 1964 Barotseland agreement now will only create a miserable trap for Barotseland, with little or no way out, because unlike in 1964 when Zambia was to be governed as a federated country in which Barotseland would be a ‘state within a state’, the FTJ Chiluba led government turned Zambia into a unitary state which governs all its provinces, including Western Province or Barotseland, from one very strong center.

It is also very clear that any proposed offer of autonomy for Barotseland is largely superficial because it is conceived out of Zambia’s fear of what it might lose if Barotseland separated rather than for what Barotseland would benefit if it stayed! It is much like a wayward man deciding to reconcile with his wife not because he still loves the wife but because he is afraid of the losses he would incur if she left with all her personal entitlements, thereby trapping the wife to a life of perpetual suffering and unhappiness!

However, many Zambians and Barotse alike, wrongly think that ‘restoring’ or implementing the defunct 1964 agreement means the same as independence! Actually, restoration will mean continued Barotseland subjugation in Zambia!

In fact, even those moderate Lozi promoting the ‘restoration’ agenda are doing so under the illusion that once the agreement has been restored or signed, Barotseland will later be granted a chance for independence within five or so years, thinking this is better than attempting to push for outright independence now. So, they claim restoration is only a ‘legal’ stepping stone to future independence!

However, this expectation is far from logical thinking because actually once the Barotseland agreement is signed and implemented, Barotseland will lose any further claim to independence now or in the foreseeable future! Barotseland will have lost all valid reasons for independence as Zambia would continue to implement the watered-down terms of the new agreements! In fact, it might take another fifty to hundred years before any meaningful independence claim would be plausibly conjured! If it has taken forty to fifty years to try and come out of the clearly abrogated 1964 agreement, it is illogical to expect that Barotseland will manage to push for independence within five to ten years of the new agreement in implementation!

However, Barotseland has now reached a crossroad where it must choose either the restoration of the dead 1964 agreement or indeed full independence from Zambia. Notably, Barotseland today could easily choose independence without any shame or fear of international condemnation because it was actually Zambia that first abrogated the 1964 agreement unilaterally.

Logically, choosing one of the two takes Barotseland further away from the other!

Choosing restoration will take Barotseland further away from independence, as even current world affairs have shown that it is equally difficult, if not more, for autonomous regions ruled under unitary states to successfully claim independence as the central government will always make laws that make it nearly impossible for such autonomous regions to get independence! For example, the fact that Catalonia and Scotland have autonomous status does not really make it any easier for them to attain their independence from Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland respectively!

In fact, Barotseland currently does have a more valid claim to independence because its claim emanates from the fact that Zambia unilaterally violated and abrogated the only treaty agreement that united Barotseland with Zambia. It is, therefore, easier for Barotseland to claim independence now as there exists a material breach to its ‘unification’ agreement.

WHY IS THE 1964 AGREEMENT A TRAP TODAY?

In 1964, Zambia was not a unitary state! In fact, it was styled as a federation because Barotseland would enjoy self-government in which it would have its own parliament, laws, courts, treasury, etc. and these did not have to be aligned to the system prevailing elsewhere in Zambia.

However, after independence, the Zambian government began to amend the constitution in order to align the governance of Barotseland with the rest of Zambia, so much that by 1969, the 1964 agreement had virtually been annulled using these constitutional changes!

So, had the 1964 agreement been honoured, it would be implemented in the context of a federal system of government and not under a unitary system of government. Barotseland would enjoy constitutionally granted self-governance without any interference from the central government, as Kenneth Kaunda’s own words made on 6th of August 1964 amplified when he said,

“…I can assure you, Sir Mwanawina, and all members of the Barotse Royal Family and of the Barotse Government that the Government (Central) has no wish to interfere with the day-to-day running of the internal affairs of Barotseland. This will be the responsibility of the Barotse Government and the intention of the Central Government will be no more than to give to the Barotse Government its maximum assistance and co-operation!”

Perhaps what the proponents of restoration need to understand is that the above situation is no longer possible because Zambia is now a constitutionally assigned unitary state as amended in 1996. Any autonomy granted to Barotseland would be merely cosmetic and will not go as far as what would have been in 1964!

Therefore, restoring the 1964 Barotseland agreement now will only create a miserable trap for Barotseland, with little or no way out, because unlike in 1964 when Zambia was to be governed as a federated country in which Barotseland would be a ‘state within a state’, the FTJ Chiluba led government turned Zambia into a unitary state which governs all its provinces, including Western Province or Barotseland, from one very strong center.

  • Social network:

Leave a comment

You are free to comment here below in accordance to our Comments Policy here http://barotselandpost.com/comments-policy

Once you have posted your comment, rest assured that it will be published, even if you don’t see it immediately, as the Comments Cache system needs to refresh and reload before your comment could become visible.

Thank your continued interest in our stories!

Comment Item

  • Nkoya Beauty Nkoya Beauty Wednesday, 29 August 2018

    If BA 64 is restored, there are several issues that must be done first to legitimize the process so that fire generations can be safeguarded.

    1. It must be restored in full
    2. in that case, zambia will cease to be a unitary state but a federation
    3. Barotseland will have its own right to rule. the BA 64 give s the Litunga and His council powers over all natural resources in barotseland, including local taxation. that means that Barotseland will have to restore its barotse treasury, open investment deals with other nations,, gather, trade, sell or involve in its own natural resources. This will require Barotseland to have a well organized local government that should spear head its own activities.
    4. barotseland must be free to have its own federal kind of governance system. the Kutas should become the local parliaments in every district and at Namuso, the National Council, and the katengo.
    5. The people of Barotseland, through their councils will be empowered, under the seal of the Litunga to make local laws to govern themselves.
    6. Other towns in Barotseland like karma, lukulu, kalabo, sesheke with their tribes must be allowed to run their districts.
    7. Lozi cannot be the only official language anymore in barotseland, but each language must be promoted, documented and used in their locality without any law opposing it
    8. the Baroness must be free to sing their own national anthem, have their own flag,court of arms
    9. The katas are already democratic, and the Barotse local government system must not be tempered with.

    If that is the case, then we the youth will not oppose it.

    Report
The Barotseland Post, also known as The Barotsepost, is an online media platform, for now, that is dedicated to reporting stories and news around Barotseland and beyond, giving exclusive coverage and access to the people and the nation of Barotseland to fully express themselves in their aspirations for self- determination.